Navigating the Changing Landscape: U.S. Treasury’s Outbound Investment Rules and Pending Legislative Developments
As institutional investors continue to expand their portfolios across global markets, the regulatory landscape is undergoing significant changes that will impact investment strategies. The U.S. Treasury Department's Executive Order 14105, made effective by the Final Rules set to take effect on January 2, 2025, introduces stringent outbound investment rules targeting specific technologies and industries in countries of concern, with a primary focus on China. In addition to these finalized rules, pending U.S. legislation could further shape the compliance environment for cross-border investments, creating new complexities for institutional investors.
This post explores the implications of the new rules for institutional investors and provides actionable insights into potential compliance strategies, including considerations for side letters and fund governance.
Key Provisions of the New Rules
Executive Order 14105 and its associated rules prohibit or require notification of certain U.S. investments in technologies critical to national security, including:
Semiconductors and Microelectronics
Quantum Computing
Artificial Intelligence
The regulations introduce a "knowledge standard" for U.S. persons, requiring investors to avoid knowingly participating in or supporting prohibited transactions—even indirectly. This creates a heightened need for robust due diligence, particularly for institutional investors engaged in complex structures such as fund-of-funds or secondary transactions.
Pending Legislative Developments to Watch
While the Treasury’s rules represent a significant regulatory milestone, pending legislation in Congress could amplify compliance challenges. Several bills are under consideration that may expand outbound investment restrictions or introduce additional reporting requirements for U.S. investors:
The National Critical Capabilities Defense Act (NCCDA): This bill aims to establish a new interagency review process for outbound investments, focusing on industries beyond those covered by Executive Order 14105. The NCCDA could broaden the scope of restricted investments to include biotechnologies and advanced energy systems.
Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA): Legislators are exploring amendments that would expand the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States’ (CFIUS) jurisdiction to include certain outbound investments. If passed, this would create a dual-layer compliance framework for U.S. investors.
International Coordination Initiatives: Ongoing discussions in Congress include potential collaboration with allied nations, such as Japan and the EU, to establish a unified approach to outbound investment screening. This could lead to reciprocal compliance obligations for institutional investors operating in multiple jurisdictions.
Investors must monitor these legislative developments closely, as their passage could dramatically alter the compliance landscape and further complicate cross-border transactions.
Impact on Institutional Investors
Due Diligence Becomes Paramount
Institutional investors must go beyond traditional diligence processes to identify potential exposure to restricted investments. This includes evaluating fund structures, underlying assets, and decision-making protocols.
Best Practices:
Implement robust due diligence frameworks to identify covered transactions.
Require fund managers to disclose exposure to restricted investments and provide assurances of compliance with U.S. laws.
Fund Governance Challenges
Global teams often oversee fund decision-making. The presence of U.S. persons in advisory or oversight roles can inadvertently trigger compliance obligations. For instance, a U.S. passport holder in a foreign office with limited investment authority may still fall under the scope of these rules.
Recommendations:
Review the roles of U.S. persons in all levels of fund governance.
Consider restructuring decision-making bodies or excluding U.S. persons from specific committees to mitigate compliance risks.
Side Letter Provisions: A Strategic Tool
Side letters have long been used by institutional investors to address unique compliance needs. Under the new rules, these agreements can play a critical role in safeguarding investor interests.
Potential Side Letter Provisions to Consider:
Binding Assurances: Require fund managers to confirm that no portion of the investor’s capital will be used for restricted investments.
Transfer Rights: Negotiate provisions allowing the investor to sell their interest or be excluded from investments that could create compliance issues.
Alternative Investment Vehicles (AIVs): Request the creation of AIVs to isolate exposure to restricted investments while enabling participation in other fund activities.
Ongoing Reporting: Include provisions for regular updates on fund exposure to covered transactions.
Addressing Blind Spots in Secondary Transactions
In secondary markets, limited visibility into underlying assets creates a compliance challenge. The rules require a "good faith" effort to avoid prohibited transactions, but the absence of detailed information can create uncertainty.
Practical Steps:
Work with fund managers to improve transparency in secondary transactions.
Include representations in purchase agreements requiring sellers to disclose known exposure to restricted investments.
Establish protocols for post-closing notifications to address compliance issues as they arise.
Global Coordination and Emerging Compliance Trends
The U.S. is collaborating with allies to align outbound investment restrictions. Countries such as the UK, Japan, and the EU are considering similar measures, signaling the potential for a unified international framework. For institutional investors, this underscores the need to prepare for overlapping compliance obligations.
What to Watch For:
Updates to the Treasury’s rules during the public review period.
Guidance on the grandfathering of pre-2025 commitments and its impact on future capital calls.
Best practices from peer institutions navigating overlapping regulatory regimes.
Action Plan for Institutional Investors
To remain compliant while maximizing opportunities, institutional investors should:
Audit Fund Structures: Review existing investments and governance frameworks to identify compliance risks.
Update Due Diligence Processes: Enhance diligence questionnaires and review procedures to include inquiries about restricted investments.
Engage with Fund Managers: Collaborate with managers to address compliance challenges and negotiate protective side letter provisions.
Monitor Regulatory Updates: Stay informed about legislative developments and new Treasury guidance.
Seek Legal Counsel: Work with alternative investment and sanctions compliance experts to develop tailored strategies for navigating the new rules.
Conclusion
The Treasury’s new outbound investment rules and pending legislation represent a significant shift for U.S. institutional investors. While these developments present compliance challenges, they also underscore the importance of thoughtful fund governance, robust due diligence, and proactive legal strategies. By staying informed and taking a strategic approach, institutional investors can navigate this evolving regulatory environment with confidence.
Stay ahead of regulatory developments and compliance trends by subscribing to our updates. Sign up to receive the latest insights, actionable guidance, and legislative updates directly to your inbox.
If you have questions about these insights or need assistance in developing compliance strategies, please contact us.